Friday, February 17, 2017

The mad, mad world of the Australian housing market



Some time ago, Adam Schwab wrote an article for Crikey.com titled: “The property market is completely bonkers and so are you to buy into it”. In this article, Adam relates the following story:

On the weekend I popped around the corner to see an auction of a nicely kept property in Albert Park, Melbourne. The three-bedroom, one-bathroom residence had some nice touches (wine cellar, cinema room, garage stacker) but was relatively small and in a second-tier street. Half an hour later the property had been knocked down for $3.755 million. The buyer was a cocky-looking 35-year-old with slightly bleached hair — he looked more in place shopping for surfboards than multimillion-dollar inner-suburban properties. Such is the state of the current property market, after the hammer went down, the couple next to me were congratulating the buyer on his purchase. “Good on him,” they quietly noted.

It is truly a bizarre situation when a 35-year-old can pay 50 times the annual rental for a property and be congratulated by onlookers for his foresight.

I couldn’t agree more. The story is crazy, but this is what is being played out all over the country.

Late last year, the Australian Financial Review featured a story on a house in Rose Street, Chatswood (pictured at the top of this article). This house sold for $3.91 million ($1 million above its reserve price), and to be honest, it looks like it belongs in a shanty town somewhere.

It should go without saying that this house is not worth anything remotely near $3.9 million. Oh, and please note that the buyer of this decrepit property had to pay approximately $200,000 in stamp duty (on top of the purchase price) to the government, making the actual cost of the property about $4.1 million!

The two stories above are symptomatic of the enormous bubble that has formed in the Australian housing market, but more specifically, the housing markets of Sydney and Melbourne.

There are a number of reasons for the situation we find ourselves in:

  • The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) sustaining rates at artificially low levels for far too long and for no good reason and without any tangible improvement in the economy;
  •  Negative gearing; and
  • Allowing non-citizens (large numbers of mainly Chinese) to purchase Australian property which has simply exacerbated an already existing problem.

But, as I have written on this site previously, the overwhelming reason is at dot point one above. The RBA under Glenn Stevens acted in an insane fashion and eventually, Philip Lowe (the current Governor) is going to have the unfortunate task of attempting to deal with the fall out.

Australia now has $1.6 trillion in mortgage debt which is around 100% of the country’s GDP (a figure which is simply not sustainable). To put this in perspective, this figure was approximately 15% of GDP 40 years ago and about 58% of GDP 15 years ago. 

What is even scarier is the fact that much of this lending has been subject to interest only terms (for set periods). This means that when these periods end, we have the potential to see default rates rise quite significantly.

Back in 2011, I said on this site that:

There are only two things than can happen to Australian house prices, they can collapse dramatically like they have done in the US, the UK, Ireland and Spain or they can go through a prolonged period (perhaps 10 years) of practically no price appreciation. I would favour the latter, but no one can rule out a price collapse.

In 2011, prices were still at a level where a price collapse could be averted, however, six years later, they have escalated to levels that make a price collapse more likely than not.

The Australian banks are also funding about half their mortgage books from offshore, making them very vulnerable to any changes in those markets. As I wrote last year:

Our banks are heavily dependent on foreign borrowings to finance their mortgage books and with the increase in foreign bond rates in recent times, the banks are going to start having to lift rates independent of the RBA in order to continue a viable existence. 

This has already started to happen.

So the question is, how do you “play” this situation?

Here are some things I would suggest:

  •  Limit your exposure to Australian banking stocks (my exposure is currently 2.5% of my net worth and that may go to zero - with bank stocks going up recently, I have taken the opportunity to sell call options over about half my holdings);
  • Take a good look at your super fund. If your fund invests largely in Australian shares and hugs the index, you are likely to have a large exposure to Australian banks, you may want to take steps to change this;
  • For those who don’t already have it, avoid (as far as possible) any direct (or indirect) investment in Australian residential property;
  • If you have a mortgage, pay off as much of it as possible while rates remain at insanely low levels;
  • Ignore stories about “ordinary” people with multi-million dollar property portfolios. These people are involved in a pyramid scheme that only has one ending – bankruptcy;
  • The time is coming where there may be opportunities to short banks and then later the companies that rely on booming housing markets like Harvey Norman, JB Hi fi and others. This of course is always very tricky and caution should be exercised. I haven’t myself done this yet, but I’m watching and waiting;
  • Putting some of your funds in “hard” currencies like the $US (or gold) is something you may want to consider. I keep a proportion (albeit small) of my liquid investments in $US.
Don’t be fooled by the recent strong performance of the major banks. There is absolutely no rational reason why they should be rising like they have.

This rise commenced very shortly after Donald Trump’s election as US President. However, while Trump’s policies may end up assisting US banks, they are not in any way, shape or form going to assist Australian banks. 

The banking environment in the US is very different to what is currently the situation in Australia, but we have so many idiots operating in the Australian market who simply “ape” whatever happens in the US, as if their brains had been removed from their heads.

I believe that Australian bank performance can only go downhill from here (although their share prices may keep rising for a while).

I hope all of what I have said above turns out to be false, but I feel the clock is at two minutes to midnight and when it strikes 12, many will be turned into pumpkins and mice.

5 comments:

  1. We bought our 4th investment property in Sydney (in addition to our home) 12 yrs ago. We still own them all. I stopped buying more because I thought prices were bubbling back then. Now, I no longer macro forecast property prices.

    That said, I think it's nuts that people are buying houses on a yield of 1.5% pa. Lower if you have to pay Land tax!

    We'really in a period of low interest rates, low unemployment & low inflation. This is uncharted waters... all the ingredients required for a bubble formation.

    Overall, I don't think a major correction will occur until interest rates (retail) hit 10% pa.

    Unlike Cinderella, I won't hang around till midnight. My Uber ride is on its way.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You were doing your buying at the right time. It's the people who are doing what you did back then right now that are going to get themselves into trouble.

    I assure you though, rates won't need to go anywhere near 10% to cause a major correction, just a few percent will do it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe high property prices is the new normal. After the GFC, too many investors are scared to invest into the stock market. To illustrate, how many people do you know have a minimum of $1M in equities / managed funds? I know only 1 person. How about $2M or more in equities? I don't know anyone.

    Let's relate that question to real estate. I personally know at least a dozen people with an investment property portfolio (excluding family home) over $1M. Over 50% have property portfolios over $2M.

    Lets look at the rational. If you don't like equities, where can the average retail investor invest? A Dominos, 7 Eleven franchise or small business? No way!

    Most households have no idea about bonds so there's only cash and residential property. Despite the high prices, most properties generate a yield more than cash at bank or TD.

    High prices must be the new norm. Did you read about Buffett selling his holiday house in Laguna Beach? He bought it for US$150K in 1971 and now is selling it for US$11M! It has ocean views from the deck - not waterfront!

    https://www.domain.com.au/news/you-can-buy-billionaire-warren-buffetts-laguna-beach-holiday-home-20170221-gugo3i/

    US$11M = AUD$14.3M. I'm sure you can get a nice waterfront house in Sydney for AUD$14.3M. Although I'm somewhat biased, Sydney is far more international and famous than Laguna Beach.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You are correct about the GFC, but it’s insane (in my opinion) for people to have virtually their entire net worth tied up in grossly overpriced property.

    Diversification is one of the very few “free hits” an investor gets and to ignore this is foolhardy.

    The yield on many properties in Sydney and Melbourne (once the landlord’s costs are included) would be very close to those of term deposits and the risk in property is now substantial.

    For those who have invested in US shares and shorted the Blackmores and Bellamys of this world the returns have been significant. Writing call options has also been very profitable of late. But the average investor simply doesn’t do these things (this is why they are average). To limit one’s investment world to property, cash and ASX listed equities is myopic.

    With respect to Buffett, let’s remember that Laguna Beach is in the greater Los Angeles area and is one of its most exclusive enclaves. LA is home to around 13 million versus Sydney’s 4.9 million or so. LA is also home to vast numbers of multi-millionaires and plenty of billionaires who can splash out this kind of money (not to mention the many rich non-LA residents who own property there). Sydney’s rich would be trivial in comparison to LA.

    I too would take Sydney over LA. I’ve always limited my time in LA when visiting the US, it’s always felt soulless to me (with apologies to my LA readers).

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for sharing the insight! Your article is very helpful and informative. I would like to read more updates from you.

    Australian Shares to Buy

    ReplyDelete